Each
and every historic building plays a significant part
of the on-going preservation
of Oregon City’s local heritage. Historic buildings reflect
the lives and aspiration of past generations and their
preservation defines the community in many ways. Most of
all, thoughtful stewardship of our buildings and surrounding
-environment can ensure that our sense of identity is passed
along to future generations.
These guidelines are authorized by Section 17.40 60 of the Oregon City Municipal
Code.Owners of properties that do not
fall under the Historic Review Process are encouraged to follow the Policies
set forth by the Historic Review Board by making exterior alterations that
maintain the structure’s integrity and are compatible with the neighborhood.
HRB Policy #1 (First Adopted 1986) – Construction
and Repair of Foundations
The finished floor elevation of the structure shall not be raised or lowered
in relation to the ground level as a result of foundation
construction or repair.Any
new foundation must be covered with skirting that matches
the original skirting on the structure.
Storm window frames and members shall be made of wood, baked enamel, or anodized
aluminum.If
wooden or enameled, the frames and members shall be painted
to match or complement the color of the existing window
trim.Mill finish aluminum storm windows are not permitted.Interior storm windows are encouraged.
HRB Policy #3 (First Adopted 1986) – Repair or Replacement
of Siding
New siding shall match
original siding both in material and style.A
sample must be submitted for review.
HRB Policy #4 (First Adopted 1986)– Gutters and
Downspouts
Replacement wooden gutters and downspouts are permitted.Galvanized
or enameled aluminum gutters and downspouts shall be
painted to match the house.All support straps shall be painted to match
the house.New
downspouts shall be located to avoid visual interference
with architectural features of the street façade.Plastic
gutters and downspouts are not permitted.If
the downspout empties onto the ground, splashblocks shall
be placed at the outflow to disperse the water away from
the foundation.
HRB Policy #5 (First
Adopted 1986) – Roofs
Structures
must be re-roofed with wood shingles, 3-tab composition
shingles, or “architectural
style” composition shingles.If the roof slope is less than 4/12, rolled
composition roofing may be used.Red,
dark green, black, dark brown or green and white composition
material is encouraged.Slate,
tile or tar and gravel roofs may be re-roofed with like
materials.The following roof materials are not permitted without Board approval:metal,
fiberglass, plastic, corrugated roofing, or shake shingles.Any
alteration to the overhang, soffit, or rake board requires
Board approval.
HRB Policy #6 (First Adopted
9/88; Revised 6/91) – Policy on Construction of Fences
and Walls
The following policy is hereby adopted by the Oregon City Historic Review Board
regarding the construction or alteration of fences and
walls within Historic Districts, on designated sites
in Conservation Districts, or on individual sites designated
as landmarks.
Fences and Walls in Front Yards and Corner Side
Yards
ACCEPTABLE
NOT ACCEPTABLE
Iron Picket
Chain-link
Ornamental Cast Iron
Post and Rail / Split Rail
Brick
Concrete Block
Combinations of Iron and Masonry
Stockade
Wood Picket – flat boards or square vertical
Plywood / Hardboard or Asbestos Panel
Woven Wire if installed according to height
Available from manufacturer and with wood
posts and rails
Hollow, Twisted Wrought Iron
Mixed Material Diagonal Board (e.g. brick / wood/vinyl)
Fences in Interior Side Yards, Alleyways
and Rear Yards
ACCEPTABLE
NOT ACCEPTABLE
All that are acceptable above
All that are not acceptable above
Concrete Block
Horizontal Board
Staggered Vertical Board (good neighbor)
Solid Wood – flat-topped, clipped top or capped vertical
Fence or Wall Height
Front yard fences orwalls and corner
side yard fencesorwalls should be no more than 42 inches
in height and shall not create a traffic site obstruction
(as defined in Chapter 10.32 of the Oregon City Municipal
Code).Along rear yards and interior side yards (beyond the front yard
setback), fences orwalls
may be up to six (6) feet in height.
Fences orwalls
that are listed in the “ACCEPTABLE” category may be reviewed
and a decision made by staff.The
primary criterion to be used by staff shall be compatibility
of the proposed fence orwall with the style and period of the
designated structure.If
the proposal is not on a designated, the primary criterion
shall be compatibility with surrounding historic structures.Either
staff or applicant shall have the option of referring the
plans to the Historic Review Board for resolution of doubtful
or contested application of standards.Fences
orwalls that are not listed, or that are
specifically listed under the“NOT
ACCEPTABLE” categorymust
be submitted for review and decision by the Historic Review
Board.
HRB Policy #7 (First
Adopted 8/96) – Construction
of Accessory Structures
Accessory structures which are 120 square feet or smaller may be reviewed and
decision made by staff.The
primary criteria to be used by staff in making the decision
shall be as follows:
·The building/structure materials shall match the primary resource structure;
·The roofing materials shall match the material on the historic/primary resource
structure; if the roofing material on the historic/primary
structureis
not compatible, Historic Review Board Policy #5 shall apply;
·The accessory structure shall be painted to match the historic/primary resource;
·The structure shall be placed a minimum of three (3) feet from any interior
lot line as per Section 17.54 - Accessory Structure Standards.
Any structure that does not meet this standard shall be referred or submitted
to the Historic Review Board for review and decision.
HRB Policy #8 – Exterior Alterations to Buildings in National Historic
Districts, or Structures in Conservation Districts or Landmark Structures
Additions shall be reviewed by the Historic Review Board.Other
alterations are subject to administrative review.Alterations
are permitted if they duplicate existing building materials
and styles.Wood siding is encouraged if the siding is
replaced.Aluminum
and vinyl siding and vinyl and aluminum mill finish windows
are not permitted, unless the building was originally
constructed of such materials and theyare the predominant materials on the building.Wood sash doors are encouraged.Roof alterations shall conform to Historic
Review Board Policy #5.
HRB Policy #9 – Screen
Doors
Screen doors shall be
compatiblewith the material,style
and period of the designated structure.
Policies 1-9 were reviewed and revised by the HRB at worksessions on October
12, November 9, 2000, and December 14, 2000, and were formally adopted on December
14, 2000 at the HRB’s duely noticed public meeting.
HRB Policy #10- Window Repair and Replacement
Original
wood windows are important architectural features in
any historic building.
They are the “eyes” of the structure and they convey a
sense of handcraftsmanship and detail that cannot be achieved
with substitute materials. The Historic Review Board maintains
that original windows should be retained and repaired whenever
possible and replacement of windows should be with in kind
materials. For all exterior alterations, involving windows,
to: all structures in the Canemah National Register District,
designated structures in the McLoughlin Conservation District
and other local Landmarks, the applicant will provide a
determination of the window’s architectural significance
and condition to assist the Historic Review Board to determine
the repair and replacement options for the property. Owners
of non-designated structures are also encouraged to follow
this policy for window repair and replacement. (Adopted October 25, 2001)
Authority for these HRB Administrative Review policies can be found in Section
17.40.060 of the Oregon
City Municipal Code.Pertinent sections are excerpted below:
A.Except
as provided pursuant to subsection I of
this section, no person shall alter any
historic site in such a manner as to affect
its exterior appearance, nor shall any
new structure be constructed in an historic
district, conservation district, historic
corridor, or on a landmark site, unless
a certificate of appropriateness has previously
been issued by the HRB. A building
addition that is thirty percent or more
in size of the original building shall
be considered new construction in a district. Further,
no major public improvements shall be made
in a district unless approved by the Board
and given a certificate of appropriateness.
B.Application
for such a certificate shall be made to
the planning staff and shall be referred
to the Board. The application shall
be in such form and detail as the Board
prescribes.
C.1. The
HRB, after notice and public hearing held
pursuant to OCMC Chapter 17.50, shall approve
the issuance, approve the issuance with
conditions or disapprove issuance of the
certificate of appropriateness.
2. The
following exterior alterations to historic
sites may be subject to administrative
approval:
a.Construction
of foundations for structures on historic
sites, subject to HRB Policy-1 established
by the Board;
b.Addition
of storm windows to structures on historic
sites, subject to HRB Policy-2 established
by the Board;
c. Repair
of siding, subject to HRB Policy-3 established
by the Board.
Additional regulations regarding historic resources may be found in Chapters
17.14 and 17.26 of the Oregon
City Municipal Code.
In addition, Section E of Oregon City’s 1982 Comprehensive Plan outlines City
Historic Preservation Goals and Policies.